Review source-code risks, explain findings and verify remediation with a follow-up scan.
Security findings are difficult to explain, prioritise and track through remediation.
Security Review Agent combines repeatable scanning with contextual explanation. It helps product teams understand why a finding matters, who owns the fix and whether remediation was effective before delivery.
A repeatable review record with evidence, ownership and fix validation.
Begin with a bounded process where source information, decisions and exceptions can be clearly defined.
Check approved source code against an agreed security scope before deployment.
Organise evidence, likely impact and remediation guidance for developer review.
Repeat relevant checks and document whether the identified issue remains.
Routine processing is automated while decisions and exceptions remain visible.
Configured around approved data, business rules and an accountable review point.
Configured around approved data, business rules and an accountable review point.
Configured around approved data, business rules and an accountable review point.
Configured around approved data, business rules and an accountable review point.
Development teams make code changes. FreedomX provides analysis and validation.
FreedomX agrees repositories, languages, exclusions and handling requirements with the customer. Deterministic scanning results are reviewed in code context, then findings are prioritised with the delivery team and retested after remediation.
FreedomX configures and manages the workflow. Customer-designated owners retain final authority over sensitive actions and business decisions.
The answers shape scope, integration effort and the level of human control.
No. Source-code review and penetration testing serve different purposes. FreedomX defines the exact assessment boundary before work begins.
No. It provides analysis and validation. Your development team reviews and implements changes.
We begin with the process owner, a representative set of approved source code, technical documentation, scan rules, the current workflow and the decisions that must remain with people. Discovery confirms the exact data, permissions and integration boundary before a pilot is proposed.
The pilot establishes a baseline and tracks practical measures such as validated findings resolved before release, time from finding to assigned owner, fix validation pass rate. FreedomX reviews quality, exceptions and human intervention before recommending a wider rollout.
Use these practical guides to define the use case, controls and evidence required for a responsible pilot.
AI agent guide
Understand how an agent differs from a chatbot or fixed automation.
Read the guidePilot planning
Compare candidate processes using value, data readiness, risk and measurement.
Use the five testsDeployment readiness
Review ownership, permissions, human approval and monitoring before launch.
Open the checklist